This week I talk with Garrett Murray about the colloquial language we use when we write, the absurdity of having to write 140 character bios, his wife, and being a parent. This is a longer one, but well worth the time.

Ben Brooks had me on his show and I spent nearly an hour roasting him and his habits and interests. A+, really fun show, good times, would do again.

Excellent post by Scott Mendelson for on how insanely stupid the media is reacting to the hacking theft of personal property:

Outlets as mainstream as People and CNN are referring to the photo leak as a “scandal.” All due respect, it’s not a scandal. The actresses and musicians involved did nothing immoral or legally wrong by choosing to take nude pictures of themselves and put them on their personal cell phones. You may argue, without any intended malice, that it may be unwise in this day-and-age to put nude pictures of yourself on a cell phone which can be hacked and/or stolen. But without discounting that statement, the issue is that these women have the absolute right and privilege to put whatever they want on their cell phones with the expectation that said contents will remain private or exclusive to whomever is permitted to see them just like their male peers. The burden of moral guilt is on the people who stole said property and on those who chose to consume said stolen property for titillation and/or gratification.

It is not Ms. Ritter’s or Ms. Dunst’s responsibility to protect their own property from theft by not creating said property or only storing it in a specific place any more than it’s any woman’s responsibility to dress a certain way, travel in groups, wear special nail polish, or what-have-you to lessen the chance that someone will attempt to assault them. As is often the case when we discuss crimes of this nature against women, we have it backwards. It is not on the (usually, but not always, female) victim to take “enough” measures to protect herself but rather on the (usually, but not always, male) victimizer to choose not to commit said crime.

The number of people “slut-shaming” these women is ridiculous. This attitude is harmful to everyone and needs to be addressed and stopped immediately.

AnonymousAnonymous asked:
Congrats on the newest addition to your family! I've noticed you've introduced both Oliver and Nolan as "Oliver Bord" and "Nolan Bord" -- do your children have their mother's last name, or is it their middle name?

Thanks! And yes, they both have their mother’s last name. And middle names are for suckers. I SAID IT.

AnonymousAnonymous asked:
When I'm taking photos, whether it be a portrait or just a general environment, I find that I have many duplicates (especially with portraits where someone is moving and each photo is slightly different) just to be on the safe side so I can ensure at least one turns out well. Would you say there's a boundary as to how many successful duplicates to keep? I'd love to keep all of them as memories but I think it's a bit overkill keeping so many especially when it takes up so much space in Lightroom.

I have a similar problem, and I’m terrible about deleting them. If they’re obvious garbage (blurry, total duplicate, bad lighting) I delete them right away, but I end up keeping the four extra versions of a good shot if they’re marginally different. The general cheapness of disk space these days has its drawbacks. I’d say the boundary is space more than anything else.